ABOUT PUB DEF

PUB DEF is a non-partisan, independent political blog based in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Our goal is to cast a critical eye on lawmakers, their policies, and those that have influence upon them, and to educate our readers about legislation and the political processes that affect our daily lives.

Help us with the cost of this site:


Got a press release, news tip or rumor to share? Maybe a suggestion on how we can improve this site? Email us at editor@pubdef.net or call or fax us at (314) 367-3429.


PUB DEF ARCHIVES:

May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005


Visit the new PubDef.TV

Subscribe to our RSS feed

Creative Commons License

 

 

 

 

VIDEO: Geisman on Eminent Domain

By Antonio D. French

Filed Tuesday, March 28 at 11:36 PM

PUB DEF EXCLUSIVE

On Tuesday, the Judiciary Committee of the Missouri House of Representatives conducted a public hearing in the State Capitol on a bill that seeks to reform the use of eminent domain in the state. One of those testifying against the bill was Barb Geisman, St. Louis City's Deputy Mayor for Development.



State Rep. John Burnett (D-40), from Kansas City, asked Geisman why the St. Louis City government seems to use eminent domain much more "willy-nilly" than K.C.



State Rep. Michael Vogt (D-66), from south St. Louis, asked Geisman about the Ronnoco Coffee Company and whether she feels that the Board of Aldermen uses blight and eminent domain powers responsibly.

Link to this story


3 Comments:

Blogger Doug Duckworth said...

"we spend millions of dollars cutting grass, cutting weeds, and tearing down buildings"

"you have a problem in stl, that we do not in kansas city"

"potential that an alderman can abuse the proceedures"

"some things should be done...in this bill...apprasial by lisenced apprasial...appropriate for a person who is condemned gets proper notice...owner gets time to move out instead of five days"

"potential for abuse...this bill corrects the potential"


I do not understand why Barbara is against the bill, because she only did a bunch of doubletalk.

We do not like the bill, yet this bill corrects the potential abuse.

WHAT are you saying!

5:31 AM, March 29, 2006

 
Blogger Claire Nowak-Boyd said...

Ms. Geisman,

If you and the Slay folks are seriously trying to fight problem property owners and slumlords like you said in this video, why haven't you guys sold off all of the LRA's properties to individuals? You all have had years, and you've proven that you're incapable of doing anything to improve even SOME of these properties, let alone all of them. It's time to sell!

And, um, with all your power, why is Blairmont and its cohorts still at large slumming up my neighborhood and other parts of the Near North Side? Hm?

9:08 PM, March 29, 2006

 
Blogger Michael R. Allen said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

11:54 AM, March 30, 2006

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Can Mr. Smith Get to Washington Anymore?

The Royale Foods & Spirits



Visit the PUB DEF Store



Advertise on Pub Def

 

 

 

Google
 
Web www.pubdef.net